Legal Opinion

Aultman & Taylor Machinery Co. v. Kennedy

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 3, 1901PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from Des Moines District Court. — Hon. James D. Smytiie, Judge. Action at law, aided by attachment. The intervener claimed the property attached under certain mortgages executed by defendant in the state of North Dakota. There was a trial to the court, resulting in a judgment finding intervener entitled to the possession of the property, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtDeemeb, J.

1 James Kennedy is a resident of North Dakota. On arid prior to August 4, 1898, he was temporarily engaged in work at or near Burlington, in this state, in which he ivas using'horses, mules, wagons, scrapers, plows, etc. During the night of August 4th Kennedy packed his entire, outfit on board the cars, to be shipped out of the state. Hearing of his purpose, plaintiff, a creditor, commenced an attachment suit, and levied on the property hitherto described. On the 14th day of March, 1898, Kennedy, who, as we have said, was a resident of North Dakota, executed a chattel mortgage covering…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Green v. Van BuskirkSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Hervey v. Rhode Island Locomotive WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Smith & Co. v. McLeanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  4. Harrison v. SterrySupreme Court of the United States · 1809
  5. Hoyt v. . Thompson'sNew York Court of Appeals · 1859

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Larson v. MetcalfSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  2. Rance v. GaddisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  3. Hart v. Oliver Farm Equipment Sales Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Chariton & Lucas County National Bank v. TaylorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  5. Millowners Mutual Life Insurance v. GoffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API