Lindner v. Kew Realty Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*37OPINION OF THE COURT
Gibbons, J. P.
We are called upon on this appeal to review the propriety of Special Term’s denial of a cross motion by the defendants third-party plaintiffs (hereinafter the defendants) to amend their answer to include the affirmative defense of workers’ compensation, and for dismissal of the amended complaint on that ground. Workers’ Compensation Law § 29 (6) pertinently provides that "[t]he right to compensation or benefits under this chapter, shall be the exclusive remedy to an employee * * * when such employee is injured * * * by the negligence or wrong of another in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Murray v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Billy v. Consolidated Machine Tool Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Haimes v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Heritage v. Van PattenNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Williams v. HartshornNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Cusano v. StaffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Iannarone v. GramerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Salswedel v. Enerpharm, Ltd.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
- Cipriano v. FYM AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Dunlap v. United Health Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.