Legal Opinion

Salswedel v. Enerpharm, Ltd.

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided October 11, 1988No. 9813PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MINZNER, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s decision granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing her negligence action with prejudice. At the time of her accident, plaintiff was an employee of Nuclear Pharmacy, one of three corporations which formed defendant partnership Enerpharm. Plaintiff contends that her action is not barred by NMSA 1978, Section 52-l-6(D) (Repl.Pamp.1987), because Enerpharm is a “person other than [her] employer” within the meaning of the Workers’ Compensation Act. We invited the participation of amicus curiae and scheduled oral…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Loucks v. Albuquerque National BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Lyon v. BarrettSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  3. Sharp v. GallagherIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Royster v. MontanezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. Eule v. Eule Motor SalesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Headley v. Morgan Management Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Garrity v. Overland Sheepskin Co. of TaosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Guerino v. Depot Place PartnershipAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  4. Payne v. Galen Hospital Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Los Ranchitos v. Tierra Grande, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API