Legal Opinion

Noroozi v. Napolitano

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 14, 2012No. 11 Civ. 8333(PAE)PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge:

Plaintiffs Afshin Noroozi and John Assadi (together, “Noroozi”) bring this declaratory judgment action under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. §§ 701 et seq, challenging the decision of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS” or “CIS”) to deny Noroozi an EB-1 “extraordinary ability” visa. The defendants, all of whom are federal government officials (“the Government”), now move for summary judgment. For the reasons below, the Court grants that motion.

I. Background1

A. The Parties

*537Noroozi is an Iranian…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Xiao Ji Chen v. United States Department of Justice, Attorney General Alberto R. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Visinscaia v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  2. Association of Proprietary Colleges v. DuncanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  3. Brezler v. MillsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2016
  4. Residents for Sane Trash Solutions, Inc. v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  5. State v. U.S. Dep't of JusticeDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API