People v. Corley
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to support the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).
We find that, upon reviewing the entire charge, the court properly instructed the jury on reasonable doubt (see, People v Canty, 60 NY2d 830; People v Yanik, 43 NY2d 97, on remand 63 AD2d 574; People v Blackshear, 112 AD2d 1044,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. MedinaNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. CantyNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. ArceNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- People v. JalahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. McCulloughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- People v. ScattareggiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. VelasquezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. RandolphAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.