Legal Opinion

Deleo v. Rudin

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided July 30, 2004No. CV-S-0270-PMP(LRL)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PRO, Chief Judge.

Presently before this Court is Defendants Michael J. Amador and Michael J. Amador Chartered’s (collectively, “Amador”) Motion to Dismiss Complaint for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction, and Alternatively, Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 70), filed on March 15, 2004. Defendant Margaret Rudin (“Rudin”) filed a Motion to Stay Dismissal of Plaintiffs Complaint Filed by Defendant Amador, Esquire, and His Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 79) on March 29, 2004. Plaintiff Joseph DeLeo, Jr. (“DeLeo”) filed a Response and Opposition to Motion to Dismiss Complaint for Lack…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mazzeo v. GibbonsDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2009
  2. Michael v. BoutwellDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2015
  3. (PS) Devi v. Sacramento Bhartiya SabhaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  4. Gibson v. City of PortlandDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024
  5. Gober v. ArnoldDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2021

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API