Legal Opinion
(PS) Devi v. Sacramento Bhartiya Sabha
District Court, E.D. California
Decided January 27, 2025No. 2:24-cv-00689Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 VINEETA DEVI, No. 2:24-cv-00689-DJC-CKD PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 SACRAMENTO BHARTIYA SABHA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff Vineeta Devi paid the filing fee and filed this civil action without counsel. This 19 matter is before the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 302(c)(21). 20 Presently before the Court is defendant City of Sacramento’s (“City”) motion to dismiss 21 plaintiff’s complaint (ECF No. 4), and defendant Sacramento Bhartiya Sabha Church 22…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.