Legal Opinion
Oxman v. Downs
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 14, 2014No. 13-CV-1741 (ADS)(AKT)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
On April 1, 2013, the Plaintiff Laurence Oxman (the “Plaintiff’) commenced this action by filing a Complaint against the Defendants Richard W. Downs (“Downs”), individually; Philip Cardinale (“Cardinale”), individually; George Bartunek (“Bartunek”), individually; and the Town of Riverhead (the “Town,” and collectively, the “Defendants”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1988. The Plaintiff asserts claims for malicious prosecution both under the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution and New York State law.
Presently before the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Harris v. MillsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mazzone v. Town of SouthamptonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Alternative Energy Southeast, Inc. v. CardConnect, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2026
- Berkley Insurance Company v. BouchardDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2020
- Energizer, LLC v. MTA Trading, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2021
- Facci-Brahler v. Montgomery CountyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.