Legal Opinion
United States v. Douglas
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided February 23, 2010No. 09-0466/AFPublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge RYAN
delivered the opinion of the Court.
In this case the military judge found unlawful command influence and then crafted a remedy in which Appellant not only appeared to acquiesce but actively participated. The military judge also gave Appellant a continuance to avail himself of the remedy and then inquired as to whether Appellant wished to raise any further issues on the matter. Appellant raised none. Appellant now alleges that the military judge reversibly erred by crafting a remedy for unlawful command influence instead of dismissing the charges against him.1 We disagree, and hold…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. MechanikSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. ThomasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. HouserUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
- United States v. GoreCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
- United States v. BiagaseCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- United States v. BoyceCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017
- United States v. BowserUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014
- United States v. BowserCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
- United States v. ArmaUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014
- United States v. BoyceCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.