Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Sensible Norwood v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Elections (Slip Opinion)

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 2016No. 2016-1277PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} This is an expedited election case in which relators seek a writ of mandamus to require respondent, the Hamilton County Board of Elections, to place a proposed “Sensible Marihuana Ordinance” on the ballot for the city of Norwood at the November 8, 2016 general election. We deny the requested writ because relators have failed to establish a clear legal right to the requested relief and a clear legal duty on the part of the board to provide the relief.

I. Factual and procedural history

{¶ 2} Relator Sensible Norwood is a political-action committee established under R.C. Chapter 3517 to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Waters v. SpaethOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Donnelly v. City of Fairview ParkOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State ex rel. Ditmars v. McSweeneyOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State ex rel. North Main Street Coalition v. WebbOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State ex rel. Hazel v. Cuyahoga County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. William Schmitt v. Frank LaRoseCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  2. State ex rel. Leneghan v. Husted (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State ex rel. Flak v. Betras (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  4. State ex rel. Federle v. Warren Cty. Bd. of Elections (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  5. State ex rel. Bolzenius v. Preisse (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API