State ex rel. Sensible Norwood v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Elections (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
{¶ 1} This is an expedited election case in which relators seek a writ of mandamus to require respondent, the Hamilton County Board of Elections, to place a proposed “Sensible Marihuana Ordinance” on the ballot for the city of Norwood at the November 8, 2016 general election. We deny the requested writ because relators have failed to establish a clear legal right to the requested relief and a clear legal duty on the part of the board to provide the relief.
I. Factual and procedural history
{¶ 2} Relator Sensible Norwood is a political-action committee established under R.C. Chapter 3517 to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State ex rel. Waters v. SpaethOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- Donnelly v. City of Fairview ParkOhio Supreme Court · 1968
- State ex rel. Ditmars v. McSweeneyOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State ex rel. North Main Street Coalition v. WebbOhio Supreme Court · 2005
- State ex rel. Hazel v. Cuyahoga County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- William Schmitt v. Frank LaRoseCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- State ex rel. Leneghan v. Husted (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- State ex rel. Flak v. Betras (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
- State ex rel. Federle v. Warren Cty. Bd. of Elections (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
- State ex rel. Bolzenius v. Preisse (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.