Legal Opinion

Edmund J. Flynn Company v. Schlosser

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 22, 1970No. 5124PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUINN, Associate Judge, Retired.

This appeal arises out of an agreement to purchase a cooperative apartment. Appellee was the prospective purchaser and appellant the agent of the seller. Appellee attempted to revoke her “offer” before the time for performance. At trial, by stipulation of both parties, the issues were reduced to one legal question: What effect was to be given a condition contained in the written sales agreement? As stated by the trial court, the question was: “Is it a condition precedent to the existence of a binding contract to purchase the apartment or a condition precedent…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Houston Oilers, Inc. v. Ralph NeelyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
  2. Luther Williams, Jr., Inc. v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Detroit Football Company v. John RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
  4. Monroe v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  5. Peerless Casualty Company v. Housing Authority of the City of Hazelhurst, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Chicago v. ThorpeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  2. Regency Commercial Associates, LLC v. Lopax, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  3. Malone v. Saxony Cooperative Apartments, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Emersons, Ltd. v. Max Wolman CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1975
  5. Carollo v. IrwinAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API