Legal Opinion
Emersons, Ltd. v. Max Wolman Company
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 27, 1975No. Civ. A. 74-974PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.
This matter came on for trial before the Court, sitting without a jury, on November 26, 1974. Plaintiffs Emersons, Ltd., et al. (hereinafter “Emersons”), seek to recover under an insurance policy a stipulated business interruption loss of $244,069.58 for its Cinnaminson, New Jersey, restaurant. The restaurant was destroyed by a fire which occurred on or about February 13, 1973. Defendants, Home Insurance Company (hereinafter (“Home”), and its general agent, Max Wolman Company (hereinafter “Wolman”), cross-claimed against one another for…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hodgson v. DexterSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Knickerbocker Life Insurance v. PendletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Royal Insurance v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Hornblower v. George Washington UniversityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1908
- Property 10-F, Inc. v. Pack & Process, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Spellman v. American Security Bank, N.A.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Priscilla Belland v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, a Federal BodyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Dailey v. ElickerDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1978
- Patton v. Aetna InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1984
- Bogley v. Middleton Tavern, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.