Legal Opinion

Pernorio v. Derwinski

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided July 24, 1992No. 90-779PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IVERS, Associate Judge:

Michael A. Pernorio, Jr., appeals from a June 20, 1990, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) decision which denied him an increased evaluation for his service-connected cystic acne with scrotal nodule. The Court holds that the BVA applied a standard that exceeded that found in the relevant regulation in order to support its conclusion that the veteran’s condition did not warrant an increase; in so doing, the BVA committed legal error. We also find that the BVA did not adequately address evidence of facial scarring and that the Board did not provide adequate reasons…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
  2. Hatlestad v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Butts v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1993
  2. Suttmann v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1993
  3. Ardison v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1994
  4. Lendenmann v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
  5. Drosky v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1997

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API