Legal Opinion

Hatlestad v. Derwinski

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided March 6, 1991No. 90-103PublishedCited by 147 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEINBERG, Associate Judge:

This case involves an appeal by Clarence T. Hatlestad from a Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) decision which concluded that he was not entitled to a total disability rating, for compensation purposes, based upon unemployability. The appellant was seriously wounded in combat during World War II. He claims he suffers from debilitating pain caused by his sendee-connected combat injuries and, as a result, is unable to work. Accordingly, he requests an increased disability rating of 100 percent. We remand this case with instructions.

I. BACKGROUND

A

Mr. Hatlestad…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
  2. Sammarco v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991

3Cited by147 opinions

  1. Caluza v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1995
  2. Schafrath v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
  3. Allday v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1995
  4. Quarles v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
  5. Masors v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992

142 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API