Legal Opinion

United States v. Whitner

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided September 24, 1999No. 98-0837/ARPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge SULLIVAN

delivered the opinion of the Court.

During the Spring of 1995, appellant, an E-5, was tried by a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members at Fort Irwin, California. Contrary to his pleas, he was found guilty of “consensual” sodomy1 and committing indecent acts with another soldier, an E-3, in violation of Articles 125 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 925 and 934, respectively. On June 15,1995, he was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, total forfeitures, and reduction of E-l. On November 30, 1995, the convening authority approved the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. United States v. AbelSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. ReynoldsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  5. United States v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. HenryCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  2. United States v. HarrowCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
  3. United States v. YammineCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
  4. United States v. BaumannCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  5. United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API