Legal Opinion

Sanday v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 10, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WARD, Circuit Judge.

The parties have stipulated that there was an oral charter between Sanday & Co., the libelants, and the United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation for a steamer to carry a cargo of wheat from Galveston to Rio de Janeiro, which necessarily implies that their minds met on all the essentials of the charter.

November 6, 1920, the respondent declared the steamer Afel under the charter party “November 15 canceling,” which, in view of all the facts, clearly meant that the charterers were to have the option of canceling if the Afel did not arrive at Galveston, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hasler v. West India S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
  2. Street v. The ProgresoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1892
  3. Street v. The ProgressoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1890
  4. Karran v. PeabodyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States Gypsum Transp. Co. v. Dampskibs Aktieselskabet KarmoyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1930
  2. Lance Williams v. S. SaboDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API