Legal Opinion

Lance Williams v. S. Sabo

District Court, C.D. California

Decided August 10, 2020No. 2:20-cv-01373-PA-KKUnknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 LANCE WILLIAMS, Case No. CV 20-1373-PA (KK) 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER DISMISSING SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH 13 S. SABO, ET AL., LEAVE TO AMEND 14 Defendant(s). 15 16 17 I. 18 INTRODUCTION 19 Plaintiff Lance Williams (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, 20 filed a Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(“Section 21 1983”) setting forth seven claims against thirty-three defendants. For the reasons 22 discussed below, the Court dismisses the FAC with leave to amend. 23 II.…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API