Legal Opinion
Application of US Authorizing Interception, Etc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 28, 1976No. Misc. No. 75-603PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
413 F.Supp. 1321 (1976)
Application of the UNITED STATES of America in the matter of an order AUTHORIZING the INTERCEPTION OF WIRE COMMUNICATIONS.
Misc. No. 75-603.
United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.
May 28, 1976.
John Rogers Carroll, Philadelphia, Pa., for movant.
J. Clayton Undercofler, III, U. S. Atty., Joel M. Friedman, Donald F. Manno, Sp. Atty., Dept. of Justice, Philadelphia, Pa., for U. S. A.
OPINION AND ORDER
FOGEL, District Judge.
We are asked to rule upon a motion made pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2518(8)(d); this particular provision pertains to electronic surveillance and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gelbard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Joseph E. Cafero A/K/A Ernie, in No. 72-1577 Appeal of Dominick Vinciguerra, A/K/A Dom, in No. 72-1578Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Amazon Industrial Chemical CorporationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1931
- Braun v. SauerweinSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- In Re Barbara Lochiatto, in Re Patrick Lochiatto, in Re John E. DunnCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Providence Journal Company v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, Raymond L. S. Patriarca, Defendant-In-Intervention-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- United States v. GellerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- State v. MullensWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2007
- Mergenthaler v. Asbestos Corp. of AmericaSuperior Court of Delaware · 1985
- In Re Parmalat Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.