Legal Opinion

Sango v. Willig

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 13, 1926No. 16678Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RAY, C.

Emma Sango, enrolled as a Creek freedman as No. 4468, seeks by this action to recover her allotment conveyed by her June 24, 1904, to Perry McKay for a consideration of $1,800, and which was, by mesne conveyances, acquired by the defendant, William Willig. As stated in plaintiff’s brief, the sole question is whether her deed to McKay is valid. Her claim is that she is of Creek Indian blood, and the restrictions upon the sale of the land were not removed by the Act of Congress of April 21, 1904, although she was enrolled as a Creek freedman. That act provides:

“And all the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Alberty v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Nunn v. HazelriggCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
  3. Miller v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Rowe v. SartainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Tiger v. FewellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API