Legal Opinion

Tiger v. Fewell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 17, 1925No. 15252PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

FOSTER, C.

In this case Joe H. Tiger, plaintiff in error brought an action in the district court of Tulsa county against the defendants in error, William M, Fewell, Sidney N. Smith, Edwin J. Peebles, J. W. Burgess, John R. Skinner, Laura- B. Wall, H. C. Rennie, A. E. Fountain, and O. F. Mainbuig, to recover possession of and quiet his title to certain land constituting a part of his surplus allotment, received by him as a member of the Creek Tribe.

A demurrer was interposed by the defendants in error, to the amended petition of the plaintiff in error, which was sustained by the trial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miller v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Rowe v. SartainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. United States v. StigallCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sango v. WilligSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Tiger v. FewellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API