Legal Opinion
Rowe v. Sartain
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 23, 1924No. 13211PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NICPIOLSON, J.,
This action was brought by Hattie Rowe, as plaintiff, against Robert L. Sartain, S. H. Criswell, Jack Summers, W. S. Fears, Coit C.-Almy, Waite Phillips, H. B. Deardorf. Exchange National Bank of Tulsa. Pensy Oil Company, a corporation, the Texas Company, a corporation, the Texas Pipe Line Company, a corporation. Twin Hill Oil & Gas Company, a corporation, and Lee Oil Company, a corporation, as defendants, to recover the possession of and quiet title to 120 acres of land situated in Okmulgee county, and to recover the rents and profits therefrom. A trial resulted in a judgment…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. WildcatSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Folk v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
- Kimberlin v. Commission to Five Civilized TribesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
- Malone v. AlderdiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
- Nunn v. HazelriggCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Witt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Tiger v. FewellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Moss J. Witt, an American Citizen of Choctaw Indian Descent v. The United States of America the Secretary of Interior the U. S. Commissioner of Indian Affairs the Attorney General of the United States, Jackie Laverne Jarman, a Cherokee Indian Citizen v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Sango v. WilligSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Tiger v. FewellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927