Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Haddad v. City of Charleston

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1922PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PoEEENBARGBR, PRESIDENT :

The respondents, the mayor and members of the council of the City of Charleston, having refused the relator a license to conduct a restaurant, in a certain room within the City limits, upon his application made therefor, in due form and after compliance with the usual preliminary requirements, he has; applied here, in the usual way, for a writ of mandamus to compel the issuance of such license.

The ordinances of the City pertaining to the subject of restaurant licenses is not materially different from those of the City of Huntington, respecting the same subject, which…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Houvouras v. City of HuntingtonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brackman's, Inc. v. City of HuntingtonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. State ex rel. Hoffman v. Town of ClendeninWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. State Ex Rel. Altop v. City of BillingsMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  4. City of San Antonio v. ZogheibCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  5. Thacker v. CrowWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API