Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hoffman v. Town of Clendenin

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1922PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lively, Judge:

Petitioners, F. E. Hoffman and H. P. Hammock, pray for mandamus to compel tbe mayor and town council of tbe town of Clendenin to issue to them license to maintain and operate pool tables in tbe rear of tbeir restaurant room at tbe corner of Piedmont Avenue and Third Street. Tbe first application did not specify the place at which tbe license was desired, and was refused October 19, 1922. Another application, which is in proper form, accompanied by tbe license fees, was “laid on tbe table,” December 7, 1922. Petitioners aver that they are of good moral character, have violated…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rose & Co. v. BrownWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Welch v. County Court of Wetzel CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Smith v. HenningWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Houvouras v. City of HuntingtonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1922
  5. State ex rel. Haddad v. City of CharlestonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Van DeVegt v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936
  2. State Ex Rel. McLendon v. MortonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Beverly Grill, Inc. v. CrowWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Backus v. AbbotWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. State v. BunnerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1943

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API