Legal Opinion

City of Crossett v. Riles

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 2, 1977No. 76-394PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice.

This is an action against the city of Crossett for breach of contract, a municipality not being suable in tort.

In 1961 the plaintiffs were living in a home near the city. In order to relieve a flooding problem the city obtained from the plaintiffs an easement, 30 feet wide, for a drainage ditch across the plaintiffs’ land. Through the years the city passively failed to keep the ditch in good repair. In 1975 a heavy rain caused the water in the ditch to overflow and rise to a depth of several inches within the plaintiffs’ house, with extensive property damage.

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. LateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  2. Zearing v. Crawford, McGregor & Camby Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1912

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rudy Webb v. Exxon Mobil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  2. Rainey v. TravisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Brown v. AquilinoCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
  4. Sterling v. LandisCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983
  5. Walt Bennett Ford, Inc. v. DyerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API