Hoffman v. Late
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.
This is an action in unlawful detainer for the possession of certain business property, used as a cafe. The tenants’ defense is that they exercised an option to renew the lease and are entitled to retain possession for an additional year. The trial court, sitting without a jury, entered judgment for the plaintiff.
The appellants, Ealph Hoffman and his wife, were not originally parties to the lease. On August 31, 1951, Late leased the property to Lawrence Clark for a primary term of one year, “with an option for an additional five years from year to year.” The lease also provides that it cannot…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dodson v. ButlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Randle v. Overland Texarkana CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
- Foster v. BeidlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
- Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Home Investment Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
3Cited by18 opinions
- C. & A. Construction Co. v. Benning Construction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
- Arkansas Rock & Gravel Co. v. Chris-T-Emulsion Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
- Farmers Cooperative Ass'n v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
- Housing Authority v. E. W. Johnson Construction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.