Legal Opinion

Sterling v. Landis

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided October 19, 1983No. CA 82-501PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George K. Cracraft, Judge.

The sole question presented by this appeal is whether parol evidence is competent to establish an oral modification of agreements contained in an instrument required to be in writing by the Statute of Frauds when offered by a stranger to the written instrument. We hold that it is.

Clifton Sterling brought this action to recover treble damages from Johnny Landis for wrongfully cutting and removing standing timber from his land without his consent. He had also initiated criminal proceedings against Landis based on that incident. Landis admitted that he had cut the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Arkmo Lumber Co. v. CantrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  2. Talbot v. WilkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1876
  3. Griffith v. Ayer-Lord Tie Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  4. Brown v. AquilinoCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
  5. Gates & Bro. v. SteeleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rainey v. TravisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. City National Bank of Fort Smith v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1987
  3. Cate v. IrvinCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993
  4. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. StrattonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985
  5. Pruitt v. Dickerson Excavation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API