Legal Opinion

United States v. Clark

Army Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided February 10, 1997No. ARMY 9501018PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GONZALES, Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was found guilty, by a panel of officer and enlisted members sitting as a general court-martial, of drunken and reckless operation of a vehicle and negligent homicide,1 in violation of Articles 111 and 134, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 911 and 934 (1988). The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence consisting of a dishonorable discharge, confinement for three years, and forfeiture of all pay and allowances.

Before this court the appellant asserts that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel at his…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  4. United States v. ScottUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  5. United States v. PaleniusUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
  2. United States v. LoweNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999
  3. United States v. MahlerNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1998
  4. United States v. ClarkArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API