Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Hann v. Fitzgerald

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 6, 1938PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGantt, J.

Action to enjoin the State Supervisor of Liquor Control, Board of Police Commissioners, Chief of Police, Chief of Detectives of the City of St. Louis and their subordinates from enforcing the Sunday provisions of the Intoxicating Liquor Act, Laws of Mo. 1935, page 267, l. c. 272. The judgment enjoined the defendant officials from interfering with the saloonkeepers selling non-intoxicating beer on Sunday. Defendants appealed.

The action was instituted by three hundred saloonkeepers. One hundred and fifty saloonkeepers intervened. All of them are licensed to sell intoxicating liquors. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Kenamore v. WoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  2. Merchants Exchange v. KnottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  3. State v. Parker Distilling Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  4. State Ex Rel. Chase v. HallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923
  5. State v. BennettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Eagleton v. McQueenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  2. Kellogg v. MurphySupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  3. Cimasi v. City of FentonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Browning v. City of Poplar BluffMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
  5. S. S. & W., Inc. v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API