S. S. & W., Inc. v. Kansas City
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
WELBORN, Commissioner.
Action for declaratory judgment that Kansas City obscenity ordinance is invalid and to enjoin its enforcement. Trial court found ordinance valid and refused relief. Plaintiffs appealed.
S. S. & W„ Inc., d/b/a Danish World and Peeping Tom’s, and Central News brought action for declaratory judgment regarding the validity of Kansas City’s obscenity ordinance, §§ 26.141 to 26.144 of the Code of General Ordinances. Plaintiffs described themselves as “engaged in the business of operating commercial movie exhibition houses, and book stores for adults only in and around Kansas…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Heller v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. 12 200-Ft. Reels of Super 8MM. FilmSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Roaden v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Kaplan v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wimberly v. Labor & Industrial Relations Commission of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
- Oliver v. City of HigginsvilleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- McNary v. CarltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
- McNary v. CarltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
- S. S. & W., Inc., Et Al. v. Kansas City Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.