Legal Opinion

General Transistor Corp. v. Prawdzik

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 18, 1957PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEINFELD, District Judge.

The individual defendant moves, pursuant to Rule 12b (7) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 28 U.S.C.A. to dismiss this action for failure to join Industro Transistors, Inc. an alleged indispensable party. The joinder of the corporation would render the Court with*2out jurisdiction since it, as the plaintiff, is a citizen of New York.

The suit seeks damages and injunctive relief by reason of the disclosure by the individual defendant to Industro Transistors, Inc. by whom he is now employed of secret processes and trade secrets allegedly acquired while employed by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Georgia v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Robbins Music Corp. v. Alamo Music, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954
  3. Martin v. ChandlerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949
  4. Republic of Italy v. De AngelisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Winchester Electronics Corp. v. General Products Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1961
  2. Morrell v. McFarlandDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1981
  3. Torrington Co. v. YostDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API