Robbins Music Corp. v. Alamo Music, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
WEINFELD, District Judge.
In this copyright infringement action, the defendants’ motion to transfer to California, pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), is denied for failure to sustain the burden of showing that “the balance is strongly” in their favor. 1 Indeed, on the papers presented the contrary appears.
The plaintiffs’ choice of forum is the district of their residence. Both plaintiffs are New York corporations engaged in business here, where their principal offices are located. The three moving defendants, two corporations and an individual, the only named defendants served with…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Ford Motor Co. v. Ryan. Ferguson v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Corsicana Nat. Bank of Corsicana v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Universal Pictures Co. v. Harold Lloyd CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Oil & Gas Ventures-First 1958 Fund, Ltd. v. KungDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Houk v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1985
- Kane v. Central American Mining & Oil, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
- General Electric Co. v. Central Transit Warehouse Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1955
- McFarlin v. Alcoa Steamship CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.