Legal Opinion
Winchester Electronics Corp. v. General Products Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 28, 1961No. Civ. 8742PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Chief Judge.
The defendant claims that it was not properly served and has, therefore, moved to dismiss. The plaintiff claims that the defendant was doing business in the State of Connecticut and that service was properly made on it pursuant to Rule 4(d) (7), F.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S.C.A., which authorizes service “in the manner prescribed by the law of the state in which the service is made for the service of summons or other like process upon any such defendant in an action brought in courts of general jurisdiction of that state.” The statute invoked by the plaintiff is § 52-59a of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- State of Washington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Electric Regulator Corp. v. Sterling Extruder Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1968
- Vertrue Inc. v. MeshkinDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2006
- Publications Group, Inc. v. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating & Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1983
- In Re Law Research Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- DiMeo v. Minster MacHine Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.