Worth v. Emerson
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, vacating a judgment. M. C. Sloss, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, P. J.
Action to enforce the lien of a street assessment. Appeal from an order setting aside a judgment previously rendered in favor of plaintiff.
The action was commenced November 4,1898, against Esther B. Emerson, John Doe, Robert Doe, and Jane Doe; the plaintiff alleging in his complaint that “the defendants on November 5, 1896 (the day the assessment became a lien) were, and still continue to be, the owners” of the lot of land described in the complaint, and that the said defendants John Doe, Robert Doe, and Jane Doe are sued by fictitious names because their true names are unknown to plaintiff.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Egan v. EganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Page v. W. W. Chase Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
- First National Bank v. DusyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Chase v. ChristiansonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Clark v. PorterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Auer v. FrankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- People v. RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934