Legal Opinion

Succession of Onorato

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 19, 1951No. 39781PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAWTHORNE, Justice.

To the final account filed by the testamentary executors in the succession of Joseph L. Onorato, certain individuals, residents of Europe, whom we shall hereafter designate as the Reichard heirs, filed opposition. The case was submitted in the lower court on a stipulation of facts, and judgment was rendered therein, recognizing opponents to be creditors of the succession and increasing the amount due them from $25,468.52, as shown on the final account, to $31,794.84, and further ordering *7the opponents to be paid, out of life insurance proceeds amounting to $12,690.75…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Holmes v. . GilmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Truelsch v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Succession of Le BlancSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  4. Brown v. New York Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
  5. Jansen v. TylerOregon Supreme Court · 1935

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,346 Robert L. Alley, Cross-Appellee v. Louis Miramon, Jr., Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  2. Mansfield Hardwood Lumber Company v. Hattie A. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  3. Hassett v. McColley (In Re O.P.M. Leasing Services, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1983
  4. Schwegmann v. SchwegmannLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Mullikin v. PedersenNebraska Supreme Court · 1955

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API