Stemmelin v. Matterport, Inc.

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 JOHN STEMMELIN, 11 Plaintiff, No. C 20-04168 WHA 12 v. 13 MATTERPORT, INC., et al., ORDER RE MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 INTRODUCTION 18 In this false and deceptive advertising action, plaintiff seeks to certify a national class and 19 an Illinois class of those who enrolled in defendants’ 3D camera partner program. For the 20 following reasons, the motion is DENIED. 21 STATEMENT 22 Defendants, Matterport, Inc., and its officers (together, “Matterport”), market “3D 23 cameras that…