Legal Opinion
Connell v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided January 13, 1994No. Civ. A. 92-674-JJFPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FARNAN, District Judge.
I.INTRODUCTION
Presently before the Court in this diversity action are Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment filed by the parties. (D.I. 32, 37, 38). The Plaintiff, Joseph Connell brought the present action against two Delaware insurance companies, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (“Liberty Mutual”) and West American Insurance Company (‘West American”), seeking damages arising out of a 1989 automobile accident that occurred in Media, Pennsylvania. In December 1992, with his father serving as guardian, the Plaintiff sued Arnold Mattei, Jr. (“the tortfeasor”) in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. LakeSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
- McCarthy v. Township of McCandlessCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- McGowan v. University of ScrantonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Frank v. Horizon Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Malmin v. Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Process Am., Inc. v. Cynergy Holdings, LLC (In re Process Am., Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2018
- Essick v. BarksdaleDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1995
- Connell (Joseph) v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, West American Insurance Company of Ohio Casualty Group of Insurance CompaniesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Malmin v. Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996