Legal Opinion

Chandler v. Bacon

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts

Decided March 28, 1887No. 1,992; No. 1,790PublishedCited by 15 opinions

In Equity. Iniervening petition of E. Ernest Caduc.

1Opinion of the CourtColt, J.

Those cases wore heard on exceptions to the master’s report. The master found that the defendants Bacon and Oaduc were promoters of the National Color Printing Company; that, as such promoters, they negotiated an agreement between the owners of certain patents and the National Color Printing Company to be formed, by which, among other things, they were to receive two-sixteenths or 3,750 shares of the capital stock of the new company, less 625 shares, which they were to assign to Robert A. Piper; that the defendants offered to the public an option to take the stock in the new' company,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Getty v. . DevlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Emery v. ParrottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Wills v. Nehalem Coal Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Western States Life Ins. Co. v. LockwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Yeiser v. United States Board & Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1901
  4. Bromschwig v. Carthage Marble & White Lime Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  5. Heit v. BixbyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API