Legal Opinion
Heit v. Bixby
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided August 7, 1967No. 64 C 118(1)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
276 F.Supp. 217 (1967)
Charles HEIT, Plaintiff,
v.
W. H. BIXBY et al., Defendants.
No. 64 C 118(1).
United States District Court E. D. Missouri, E. D.
August 7, 1967.
Ackert & Tompkins, St. Louis, Mo., and Pomerantz, Levy, Haudek & Block, New York City, for plaintiff.
Bryan, Cave, McPheeters & McRoberts, St. Louis, Mo., for defendants Bixby and others.
Guilfoil, Caruthers, Symington, Montrey & Petzall, St. Louis, Mo., for defendants Blumeyer and others.
Armstrong, Teasdale, Kramer & Vaughan, St. Louis, Mo., for defendants St. Louis Fire & Marine Ins. Co. and others.
W. D. Rund, St. Louis, Mo., for…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Briggs v. SpauldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Jackson v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- General Rubber Co. v. . BenedictNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Western States Life Ins. Co. v. LockwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Hill v. Rich Hill Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1893
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Wolgin v. SimonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- Francis v. United Jersey BankSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Rowen v. Le Mars Mut. Ins. Co. of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
- Whitfield v. LindemannCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Stern v. Lucy Webb Hayes National Training School for Deaconesses & MissionariesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.