Legal Opinion

McKnight v. Knisely

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1865PublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPEAL from tie Floyd Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtGregory, J.

This is a proceeding by Knisely, Stout and Kellogg, judgment creditors of Richie, against Richie, Akin, McKnight, Webber and Crawford, under the statute regulating “proceedings supplementary to execution/*- 2 G. & EL, p. 260, et seq: The complaint averred that Akin had certain choses in action in his possession which belonged to Richie; that the appellants, McKnight and Webber, were indebted to Richie in the sum of $1,200, on account of certain notes executed by them to him. The defendants answered under oath, and Richie and Akin answered interrogatories put to them by the plaintiffs.

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Valette v. MasonIndiana Supreme Court · 1849
  2. Westbrook v. RobinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1839

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hudson v. TysonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Schwedland v. BachmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Cook v. Citizens National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Straughan v. FairchildIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Bell v. Wabash Valley Trust CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API