Legal Opinion

Straughan v. Fairchild

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1881No. 8343PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the Allen Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.

— Complaint by the appellee against the appellant upon a promissory note, alleged to have been made in. Ohio and endorsed by the payee to the appellee before maturity and for value. The law of Ohio is also pleaded, under which the note was negotiable as an inland bill by the law merchant.

The appellant answered by pleas of partial and entire want of consideration, and alleging that the note was assigned to the appellee as collateral security for a pre-existing debt of the payee to the appellee. Upon demurrer for want of facts, these answers were held insufficient.

The important question in the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Swift v. TysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  2. Railroad Co. v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Maitland v. Citizens' National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1874
  4. Busenbarke v. RameyIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Bay v. CoddingtonNew York Court of Chancery · 1821

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People's Savings Bank v. BatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Martin v. Bankers' Trust Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Franklin Savings Bank v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1893
  4. Ledbetter v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Price v. ElmbankDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1896

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API