Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Miller v. Lancaster County

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1882PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Motion to dismiss appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

In May, 1882, the relator commenced proceedings by mandamus in the district court of Lancaster county to compel the defendant to act upon á certain claim filed by him against the county. The defendant filed a return in the form of an answer to the writ, to which the relator filed a demurrer. The defendant appeal to this court. The relator moves to dismiss the appeal as being unauthorized.

Appeals are authorized by statute in actions in equity, but a proceeding by mandamus is strictly a legal action. In Commonwealth v. Dennison, 24 How., 97, Taney, Ch. J., says: “A mandamus in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth of Ky. v. DENNISON, GOVERNOR, &C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1861
  2. Stewart v. CarterNebraska Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. City of Grand Island v. Union Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  2. State ex rel. McDonald v. FarringtonNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  3. State ex rel. Moore v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha R. R.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  4. State ex rel. Chemical National Bank v. School District No. 9Nebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  5. State ex rel. Warren v. RaabeNebraska Supreme Court · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API