Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Moore v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha R. R.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1886PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Original application for mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

Maxwell, Ch. J.

This is an application for a mandamus to compel the •defendant “ to stop its trains, and to build a suitable depot, ■side tracks, switches, and cattle yards on its line of railroad ;at North Side, as shall reasonably accommodate the public, .and conform to the requirements of the law,” etc. The relators allege in their petition, in substance, that said railroad was completed in May, 1882, that at that time said ■corporation established as tation on the west half of section •8 in township 25, range 2 east, for the purpose of receiving and discharging freight and passengers; that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth of Ky. v. DENNISON, GOVERNOR, &C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1861
  2. State ex rel. Mattoon v. Republican Valley RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Long v. State ex rel. HoxieNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
  4. State ex rel. Miller v. Lancaster CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Nebraska Telephone Co. v. State ex rel. YeiserNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  2. State ex rel. Lancaster County v. C., B. & Q. R.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  3. State Ex Rel. Krieger v. Board of SupervisorsNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  4. City of Crawford v. DarrowNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  5. State ex rel. Kelley v. FergusonNebraska Supreme Court · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API