John E. Walrath v. Carol P. Getty and United States Parole Commission
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
In this habeas corpus proceeding, John Walrath challenges the revocation of his parole. Mr. Walrath claims that the Parole Commission revoked his parole because he had protested the administration of a medical test required by a special condition of his parole. He asserts that it violates the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment to predicate the revocation on this basis because the Commission had previously stated that it would not interfere with his right to protest. Mr. Walrath further alleges that revoking his parole on this ground violates his First Amendment…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Faheem-El v. KlincarCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Zannino v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Paul Ivan Birzon, in Behalf of Morris Satz v. Edward S. King, United States Marshal and Hon. Michael A. Amico, Sheriff of Erie CountyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Milford Eugene Slader v. Percy H. Pitzer, 1Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- United States Ex Rel. Moore v. ConnerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
- Alexander v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Delman Wesley Ball v. Joseph W. Booker, Sr., WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Faul v. LejeuneDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2024
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.