Legal Opinion

State v. Torres

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 23, 2002No. 19668-2-IIIPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

This is a prosecution for first degree assault. Rosalio Torres, Jr., assigns error to the court’s refusal to dismiss the case because the court failed to set his trial within the requirements of the speedy trial rule, CrR 3.3. The court continued the trial to accommodate scheduled polygraph training of the State’s witness. However, the record is inadequate for us to pass upon the propriety of that ruling. Mr. Torres, through his attorney, stipulated, however, to the consolidation of this case with a companion prosecution, and that is a tenable ground for continuing the trial. Mr. Torres also…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. State v. HoffmanWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. FordWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. GrisbyWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. MacKWashington Supreme Court · 1978

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. O'NEALCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  2. State v. TorresCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  3. State v. Heredia-JuarezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  4. State v. NguyenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  5. State v. NguyenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API