Legal Opinion

Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Mazza

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 31, 1975No. Appeal, No. 349PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cercone, J.,

Plaintiff, Nationwide, appeals the order of the court below granting defendant’s motion for judgment n.o.v.

This case involves a fire which occurred in an apartment which was insured by Nationwide. Nationwide paid for damages caused by the fire and then, as subrogee, sued the insured’s son, the defendant herein, claiming that the fire was caused by his negligence. Nationwide contends that during a visit to his mother’s apartment the defendant started the fire on the living room couch while smoking a cigarette.

Basically the facts of the case are as follows. On the day of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Ebersole v. BeistlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Schofield v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. Connor v. HawkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. Connelly Containers, Inc. v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lanza v. PorettiDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Rubinstein v. J. E. Kunkel Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API