State v. Mize
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EXUM, Justice.
The only question presented on appeal is whether the trial court erred in not submitting the defense of self-defense to the jury pursuant to defendant’s request. We hold there is no evidence of self-defense and the trial court properly denied the request.
The evidence presented at trial tended to show that the defendant, Edgar Earl (“George”) Mize, and the victim, Joe McDonald, had been friends for several years until a disagreement arose concerning payment McDonald owed Mize for some tree cutting work they had done together. Relations between the two deteriorated further on 31…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. BushSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. NorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. PotterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. WallaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. MontagueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State v. ReidSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- State v. McAvoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- State v. NormanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- State v. RichardsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
- State v. MaynorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.