Legal Opinion

State v. Wallace

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 9, 1983No. 90A83PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MITCHELL, Justice.

The defendant contends that the trial court erred in not striking testimony that referred to “bloodstains.” We hold that such a characterization was admissible. The defendant also assigns as error the failure of the trial court to instruct the jury as to the possible verdict of guilty of involuntary manslaughter. We agree that the charge should have been given and order a new trial.

The evidence for the State tended to show that the defendant lived in South Carolina. On the afternoon of 24 April 1982, he rode with four other people to Hamlet, North Carolina to visit his…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. State v. FoustSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. State v. BushSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  5. State v. RedfernSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. State v. FaulknerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  2. State v. ReidSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  3. State v. LyonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  4. State v. GappinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  5. State v. MizeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API