Park Electrochemical Corp. v. Delco Electronics Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
We affirm the jury verdicts on appeal, as well as the denial of Nelco’s attorneys fees. We reverse the denial of Nelco’s costs. Because the facts are familiar to the parties, we recount them only as necessary to explain our decision.
1. The district court did not prejudice Nelco by refusing its request to modify the jury instructions on the breach of contract claim. The additional sentence Nelco requested simply repeated, in slightly different words, the explanation contained in the jury instructions given. That instruction stated that the buyer could not “reduce or eliminate its…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Associated Indemnity Corp. v. WarnerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Troy Swinton v. Potomac Corporation, Dba Crescent Cardboard Company, Dba crescent/u.s. MatCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Nile T. Deland v. Old Republic Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Tracy Ray Vaughan, and Mark Koch, Donald Nelson, and Mark Osborne v. James RickettsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Temple v. Temple, Unpublished Decision (1-13-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005