Rainey v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
Panel: Woodward, C.J., Beachley, Fader, JJ.
Fader, J.
*370 In 1987, a jury convicted the appellant, J. Reuben Rainey, of murdering two women. Now, based on a mistaken docket entry that has since been corrected, he claims that the sentences for his first-degree murder convictions are illegal. The Circuit Court for Baltimore City denied his motion to correct an illegal sentence. We affirm for two independent reasons: (1) the basis of the illegality claimed by Mr. Rainey is not cognizable under Rule 4-345(a), the rule under which Mr. Rainey is proceeding; and (2) we perceive no error in the *186 circuit…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Walczak v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Randall Book Corp. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Chaney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- State v. GriffithsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Moosavi v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hartless v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2019
- Hughes v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2019
- Balageas v. SolomonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2025
- Garcia v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- Hamrick v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.