Legal Opinion

Rainey v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 2, 2018No. 1362/11PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Panel: Woodward, C.J., Beachley, Fader, JJ.

Fader, J.

*370 In 1987, a jury convicted the appellant, J. Reuben Rainey, of murdering two women. Now, based on a mistaken docket entry that has since been corrected, he claims that the sentences for his first-degree murder convictions are illegal. The Circuit Court for Baltimore City denied his motion to correct an illegal sentence. We affirm for two independent reasons: (1) the basis of the illegality claimed by Mr. Rainey is not cognizable under Rule 4-345(a), the rule under which Mr. Rainey is proceeding; and (2) we perceive no error in the *186 circuit…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Walczak v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. Randall Book Corp. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  3. Chaney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  4. State v. GriffithsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  5. Moosavi v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hartless v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  2. Hughes v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  3. Balageas v. SolomonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2025
  4. Garcia v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  5. Hamrick v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API