Cook v. Chapman
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On exceptions to master’s report.
1Opinion of the Court
Van Fleet, V. C.
The questions now before the court for decision arise on exceptions to a master’s report. When the bill in this case was filed, the complainant obtained an order requiring the defendant to show cause why an injunction should not issue against him. Subsequently, an injunction was granted conditionally, the condition being that the complainant should execute .a bond, with sureties, to the defendant, conditioned to pay him such damages as he should sustain by reason of the injunction, in case it should finally be decided that he was not equitably entitled to the in*153junction. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Oelrichs v. SpainSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Andrews v. . the Glenville Woolen Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Edwards v. BodineNew York Court of Chancery · 1844
- Aldrich v. ReynoldsNew York Court of Chancery · 1846
- Disbrow v. . GarciaNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mayflower Industries v. Thor Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- In the Matter of Merger and ConsolidationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
- BEASON v. I. E. MILLER SERVICES, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
- Division 163 of the Amalgamated Ass'n of Street Employees of America v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Beekwilder v. BeekwilderNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.